Okay, this link is quite a long read, but it's worth it, I promise.
http://mikepitts.wordpress.com/2014/04/04/is-the-car-park-skeleton-richard-iii-of-course-not-its-a-skeleton/
My thoughts: So, complete skeleton, found where history says he was buried, plus evidence of a curved spine, plus DNA evidence = "nope, can't say it's him, too many other possibilities" but a partial pelvic bone, which may or may not be male, which has been moved around more times thanElizabeth Taylor was married, which was mixed in with remains of other persons = yup, we can say it might be him. Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Biddle was involved in the 2nd search & not the first one, could it?
No comments:
Post a Comment